Legal Opinion

CRAWFORD v. WOZNIAK

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided April 29, 2025No. 1:21-cv-15811Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY MARY CRAWFORD, Case No. 21–cv–15811–ESK–AMD Plaintiff, v. OPINION ZALES DELAWARE, INC., et al., Defendants. KIEL, U.S.D.J. THIS MATTER is before the Court on defendants Zales Delaware, Inc. (Zales) and Sandra Wozniak’s motion for summary judgment (Motion). (ECF Nos. 39, 39–2 (Mov. Br.).) Plaintiff filed an opposition to the Motion (ECF Nos. 41, 46 (Opp’n Br.)), in response to which defendants filed a reply (ECF Nos. 43, 47 (Reply Br.)). For the following reasons, the Motion is GRANTED. I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND In July 2015, plaintiff was hired…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API