Legal Opinion

Montgomery v. Tucker

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 1, 1934No. 5 Div. 174PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROWN, Justice.

This is an action of trover for the conversion of five bales of cotton produced by J. F. Higgins during the year 1930, on his farm in Chambers county, covered by a mortgage executed by Higgins to the Chambers -County Bank on the 4th day of January, 1930, to secure an indebtedness due and payable on the 1st day of November,-1930.

The complaint alleges that the cotton was converted by the defendants during the months of September and October, 1930.

The trial was by the court without the intervention of a jury on evidence taken ore tenus, and resulted in a judgment for the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Barrett v. City of MobileSupreme Court of Alabama · 1900
  2. Johnson v. Wilson & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1902
  3. Albertville Trading Co. v. CritcherSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
  4. Tallassee Falls Mfg. Co. v. First National BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1909
  5. Phillips v. HartselleAlabama Court of Appeals · 1919

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. McQueen v. BrandonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1943
  2. Montgomery v. City of AthensSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
  3. Montgomery Production Credit Ass'n v. M. Hohenberg & Co.Alabama Court of Appeals · 1943
  4. Mixon v. WhitmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1966
  5. Snead v. StephensAlabama Court of Appeals · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API