Legal Opinion

State Highway Department v. Wells

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 16, 1960No. 38310PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Nichols, Judge.

The usual general grounds of the condemnor’s motion for new trial were expressly abandoned in its brief and will therefore not be considered.

Special grounds 1 and 2 of the amended motion for new trial complain of the refusal of the trial court to rule out certain evidence. C. B. Washburn and Corbin C. Roberts, as witnesses for the plaintiff, testified as to the value of certain property. Each testified that, other than the lot on which the condemnee’s house was located, there was room for six other lots on the property being condemned and that each such lot had a market value…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Martin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1931
  2. Southern Railway Co. v. RichardsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1933
  3. Tift v. State Highway DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1959

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Dash v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1971
  2. State Highway Department v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
  3. Central Container Corp. v. WestbrookCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
  4. Freedman v. Housing Authority of City of AtlantaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
  5. Williams Bros. Grocery Co. v. BlantonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API