Overton v. Conner
Texas Supreme Court
Appeal from Smith. Tried below before the Hon. M. H. Bonner. The facts sufficiently appear in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Moore, Chief Justice.
Appellants insist that the judgment in this case should be reversed for the refusal of the court to submit to the jury an issue asked by them, and which they insist was essential to its correct determination.
That the point presented by appellants’ brief may be fully understood, it is necessary for us to state the facts on which the action of the court complained of was had.
Among other defenses, appellees Conner and Cunningham, defendants in - the court below, pleaded that on the 5th of July, 1876, they delivered to the plaintiffs, appellants in this court, 252,549 feet of…
2Cited by19 opinions
- Johnson v. PortwoodTexas Supreme Court · 1896
- Ferguson-McKinney Dry Goods Co. v. GarrettTexas Commission of Appeals · 1923
- Pugh v. TurnerTexas Supreme Court · 1946
- Robertson v. TrammellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1904
- Frankfurt-Barnett Co. v. William Prym Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1916
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.