Legal Opinion

Holtman v. Knowles

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided April 23, 1914PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Injunction. Before Judge Pendleton. Fulton superior court. December 15, 1913.

1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.

1. Where one sells Ms stock in a corporation, and as a part of the contract of purchase and sale stipulates that he will not engage in the same business as a competitor, either on his own behalf or as an employee of others, in a limited territory within a period of five years, such provision is not invalid as being in general restraint of trade. Nor was the limitation in this ease unreasonable.

2. The court did not abuse its discretion in granting an interlocutory injunction.

3. But it appearing that the court in its judgment made the temporary restraining order permanent, direction is given…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Cassidy v. HowardSupreme Court of Georgia · 1913

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. National Linen Service Corp. v. ClowerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1934
  2. Legg v. HoodSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
  3. Jennings v. Shepherd Laundries Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1925
  4. Southeastern Pipe-Line Co. v. GarrettSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
  5. Wood v. McKinneySupreme Court of Georgia · 1949

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API