Legal Opinion

Flynt v. Leis

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided April 12, 1978No. 77-3426PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MERRITT, Circuit Judge.

The Court of Common Pleas of Hamilton County, Ohio, has refused to allow two out-of-state lawyers, Herald Price Fahringer and Paul J. Cambria, Jr., to appear pro hac vice (meaning “for this turn” or case) on behalf of publisher Larry Flynt and Hustler Magazine, Inc., defendants in a pending state criminal obscenity case. After an unsuccessful attempt to obtain a writ of mandamus from the Supreme Court of Ohio, the two lawyers and their clients filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio. They alleged a violation of the Sixth…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Monroe v. PapeSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. Gerstein v. PughSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  5. Railroad Comm'n of Tex. v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Jerry Parker, Jr. v. Kenneth TurnerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1980
  2. Barbara Habich v. City of Dearborn John Cascardo and John NagyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
  3. Huynh Thi Anh and Dao Thanh Linh v. Edward Levi, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1978
  4. Gully v. KunzmanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1979
  5. United States v. State of OhioCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1979

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API