Legal Opinion

Maki v. S. J. Groves & Sons

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 21, 1937No. Docket No. 49, Calendar No. 39,257PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChandler, J.

Oscar E. Maki was employed as a foreman by the defendant, S. J. Groves & Sons, road contractors. On December 23,1935, he, together with other workmen, was engaged in removing ice from a low spot in a proposed road bed. The ice was first sawed into chunks and then pulled from the water with the aid of tongs. At about 3:30 in the afternoon, Maki was prying on a piece of ice with a ladder while others pulled with tongs in an attempt to re move the same from the hole from which it had been cut. The testimony indicates that this particular piece of ice was larger than ordinary and that the number…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Podkastelnea v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Gumtow v. Kalamazoo Motor ExpressMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Herbert v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Ames v. Lake Independence Lumber Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Larosa v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1935

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Clifton v. Chrysler Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Banks v. Packard Motor Car Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1950
  3. La Duke v. Consumers Power Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Gower v. Department of ConservationMichigan Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Hutchinson v. TambascoMichigan Supreme Court · 1944

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API