Legal Opinion

Rauser v. Pa. Bd. of Prob. & Parole

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 2, 1987No. 304 C.D. 1987PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Senior Judge Barbieri,

Henry Rauser, Petitioner, has filed a petition for review in the nature of a mandamus action invoking our original jurisdiction under Section 761 of the Judicial Code, 42 Pa. C. S. §761, against the Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole (Board). In his action, he seeks a writ of mandamus to compel the Board to vacate its recommitment of him as a technical parole violator and recompute his parole backtime and service of subsequent sentences to run concurrently, rather than consecutively as the Board has done. The Board has filed preliminary objections in…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Bronson v. Commonwealth Board of Probation & ParoleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  2. Rivenbark v. Commonwealth, Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  3. Commonwealth v. ZuberSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  4. Clair v. Commonwealth, Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  5. Commonwealth v. DorianSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Paratransit Ass'n of Delaware Valley, Inc. v. YerusalimCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  2. Commonwealth v. RomoliniSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  3. Flowers v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  4. Kimmel v. Nationwide Life Insurance, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Cumberland County1989
  5. PARATRANSIT A., DELAWARE v. v. YERUSALIMCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API