Legal Opinion

Kimmel v. Nationwide Life Insurance

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Cumberland County

Decided May 23, 1989No. 76 Civil 1989Published

1Opinion of the Court

HESS, J.,

- Clair Kimmel filed a complaint on January 6, 1989, seeking consequential damages arising from Nationwide’s failure to pay on his loan obligation to Commonwealth National Bank while he was disabled. Nationwide filed preliminary objections in the nature of a demurrer, asserting that Pennsylvania law does not permit an insurance policy beneficiary to recover consequential damages when an insurer wrongfully withholds coverage. There is no Pennsylvania appellate authority on point.

The complaint contains the following averments. Nationwide issued a creditor’s group disability insurance…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Nichols v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1983
  2. Larsen v. Philadelphia Newspapers, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  3. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co. v. DayMississippi Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Gross v. Connecticut General Life Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1965
  5. Giovannitti v. Nationwide InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API