Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Spadafora v. Toledo City Council

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 1994No. 1994-2210PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDouglas, J.

In the case at bar, certain circulators (including William Baker) signed an oath on petitions that they received no compensation for their services as petition circulators. William Baker himself, the Lucas County Board of Elections and the Toledo City Council all now agree that Baker was paid to circulate the petitions and the oath of the circulators was false. In fact, it was decided by the board of elections not to refer Baker for criminal prosecution only because Baker requested TDR not to file the part-petitions in question. The petitions were, however, filed.

*549R.C. 3519.06(D) provides that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Semik v. Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State ex rel. Concerned Citizens for More Professional Government v. City Council of ZanesvilleOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  3. State, Ex Rel. Watkins v. QuirkOhio Court of Appeals · 1978

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Sinay v. SoddersOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  2. State ex rel. Becker v. City of EastlakeOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  3. State ex rel. Hackworth v. HughesOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  4. State ex rel. Becker v. EastlakeOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Ohio Manufacturers' Assn. v. Ohioans for Drug Price Relief Act (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API