Legal Opinion

Bodam v. GTE, Corp.

District Court, C.D. California

Decided March 8, 2002No. EDCV-00-0194 RTPublished

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS THE THIRD CLAIM OF THE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO FED R CIV P 12(b)(6)

TIMLIN, District Judge.

The court, Judge Robert J. Timlin, has read and considered Defendants GTE Corp., fka Continental Telecom (“GTE”), GTE Long Term Disability Plan (“LTD Plan”), and UNUM Life Insurance Company of America, erroneously sued as UN-UMProvident Life Insurance Company of America (“UNUM”) (collectively “Defendants”)^ motion to dismiss the third claim of Plaintiffs second amended complaint (“SAC”) pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) (“Rule 12(b)(6)”),…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  3. Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. United States v. TurketteSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Nl Industries, Inc. v. Stuart M. KaplanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API