Legal Opinion

Pierson v. Rellstab Bros.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 14, 1927PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The following is the opinion of the court below:

Taylor, J.

The restrictive covenant in this case was imposed in 1888 upon lands in New Rochelle, then a more rural community than at present. Undoubtedly, we may suspect that the party originally imposing it,, as well as the grantee, contemplated a high class residential development rather than one of multi-family houses. Whatever we may suspect was the intention, unless it is contained in the express language of the covenant itself or is legally inferable therefrom, such suspected intention may not be given effect. The court may not read into…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Minister, Elders & Deacons of the Reformed Protestant Dutch Church v. Madison Avenue Building Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1915

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bear v. BernsteinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
  2. Peterson v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932
  3. Pulitzer v. CampbellNew York Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Vandershoot v. KocherNew York Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Koett v. TateCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API