Poirier v. Commissioner
District Court, E.D. Louisiana
1Opinion of the Court
RUBIN, District Judge:
This is a suit by a taxpayer against the Commissioner of Internal Revenue and an Internal Revenue agent to restrain enforcement of a summons issued to a third party, National American Bank, under Section 7602 of the Internal Revenue Code. 26 U.S.C. § 7602. The defendants move to dismiss.
The most perfunctory reading of the authorities indicates that the motion to dismiss should be granted. In Reisman v. Caplin, 1964, 375 U.S. 440, 84 S.Ct. 508, 11 L.Ed.2d 459, suit was *466filed for a similar injunction. The Supreme Court concluded that the taxpayers “have an adequate remedy…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Reisman v. CaplinSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- United States v. Manuel E. Kulukundis and M. Michael KulukundisCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964
- Fitzmartin v. BinglerDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1965
- Lesser v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1964
3Cited by11 opinions
- Porter v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2008
- Raymond W. Beall Hazel A. Beall v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003
- Armstrong & Armstrong, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 1973
- Baker v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1975
- Beall v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.