Legal Opinion
United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company v. George W. Whitesides Company, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided May 14, 1991No. 90-5965PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ALAN E. NORRIS, Circuit Judge.
Defendant, George W. Whitesides Company, appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment to plaintiff, United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company (USF & G). In this diversity action, USF & G sought a declaration that it was not required by the terms of its liability insurance policy to defend or indemnify White-sides as the result of any claims asserted against Whitesides by the United States or the State of Kentucky stemming from its being the generator of hazardous substances located at several Kentucky “su-perfund” sites. The district court concluded…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Fl Aerospace, Cross-Appellee v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- Weaver v. National Fidelity Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1963
- United States Fire Insurance Company v. Kentucky Truck Sales, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
- Pierce v. West American Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1983
3Cited by9 opinions
- St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company v. Warwick Dyeing CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
- O'Brien Energy Systems, Inc. v. AMERICAN EMPLOYERS'INS. CO.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- J. JOSEPHSON v. Crum & ForsterNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1996
- East Quincy Services District v. Continental InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1994
- Venoco, Inc. v. Gulf Underwriters InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.