Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Coulter v. City of Rawlins

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided April 19, 1983No. 5764Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partRooney, Chief Justice

I concur with that part of the majority opinion relating to the award of attorney’s fees and that part relating to the inapplicability of the home-rule constitutional amendment to this matter.

*905I disagree with the majority opinion in its conclusion that the water and sewer connection fees and the fees in lieu of parklands dedication were proper.

WATER AND SEWER CONNECTION FEES

From a common-sense or practical standpoint there must be something wrong with a situation in which the people1 in an area being annexed to the city can be made to pay all, or a disproportionate part, of the capital cost of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Aunt Hack Ridge Estates, Inc. v. Planning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1970
  2. Edwards v. O'BrienWyoming Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Town Council of Hudson v. Board of CommissionersWyoming Supreme Court · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API