Myerholtz v. Conway
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Bell, Presiding Judge.
Ground 1 of the amended motion for new trial objects to the trial court’s refusal to grant defendants’ oral motion to strike certain portions of plaintiff’s petition. An oral motion to strike performs the office of a general demurrer, and it may not be reviewed on motion for new trial. Meads v. Williams, 55 Ga. App. 224 (189 SE 718); Postell v. Hearn, 104 Ga. App. 765 (123 SE2d 13); Turner v. Barber, 131 Ga. 444 (62 SE 587); Leathers, v. Leathers, 132 Ga. 211, 213 (2) (63 SE 1118).
Special ground 3 objects to the failure of the trial judge to charge the provisions of Code…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Central Railroad v. HarrisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1886
- Turner v. BarberSupreme Court of Georgia · 1908
- Leathers v. LeathersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
- Brown v. KirklandCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
- Chattahoochee Valley Railway Co. v. BassCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1911
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Aultman v. SpellmeyerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
- Aultman v. SpellmeyerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
- Hardin v. Victory Cab Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1966