Legal Opinion

State v. Kuehn

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 14, 2000No. S-99-229, S-99-230PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMiller-Lerman, J.

NATURE OF CASE

In two consolidated appeals, the State appeals the order of the district court for Stanton County made in the combined separate proceedings filed by Mark D. Kuehn in which he challenged the validity of two prior felony convictions for purposes of penalty enhancement under the habitual criminal statute. The district court concluded that the two prior convictions were invalid for penalty enhancement purposes because there was no affirmative showing in the records of the prior cases that Kuehn had expressly waived his privilege against self-incrimination when he entered guilty…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Custis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Nichols v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. State v. IrishNebraska Supreme Court · 1986
  5. State v. BurlisonNebraska Supreme Court · 1998

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. TuckerNebraska Supreme Court · 2000
  2. State v. EppNebraska Supreme Court · 2009
  3. State v. BenzelNebraska Supreme Court · 2004
  4. State v. HallNebraska Supreme Court · 2005
  5. State v. PortscheNebraska Supreme Court · 2000

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API