Legal Opinion
State v. Portsche
Nebraska Supreme Court
Decided March 3, 2000No. S-99-533PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMiller-Lerman, J.
NATURE OF CASE
Tod Portsche, appellee, was charged in the district court for Lancaster County with being a felon in possession of a firearm in violation of Neb. Rev. Stat. § 28-1206 (Reissue 1998). The case was tried to the court which entered an order finding that because Portsche’s prior felony conviction was uncounseled, he was not a convicted felon for purposes of § 28-1206, and that, therefore, his prior conviction could not be used to establish the material element of being a convicted felon pursuant to § 28-1206. The trial court found Portsche not guilty.
The State sought leave to docket…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Burgett v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Custis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- State v. WattNebraska Supreme Court · 2013
- In re N.G.Illinois Supreme Court · 2019
- State v. MangumCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
- State v. VannNebraska Supreme Court · 2020
- State v. BottolfsonNebraska Supreme Court · 2000
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.