Legal Opinion

Bud Crossman Plumbing & Heating v. Commissioner of Taxes

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided November 2, 1982No. 474-81PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeck, J.

This is an appeal by the plaintiff, a Rutland plumbing and heating contractor, from an order of the Washington Superior Court upholding a sales tax deficiency assessed against him by the Vermont Department of Taxes. Plaintiff *184applied to the Commissioner of Taxes for a hearing in accordance with 32 V.S.A. § 9777. At the conclusion of the hearing, the Commissioner determined the assessment was proper under 32 V.S.A., Chapter 233, whereupon the plaintiff appealed to the superior court, 32 V.S.A. § 9817, and subsequently to this Court. We affirm.

In the regular course of business, plaintiff bought…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. In Re Agency of Administration, Etc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1982
  2. Committee to Save the Bishop's House, Inc. v. Medical Center Hospital of Vermont, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1979
  3. State of Vermont Department of Taxes v. Tri-State Industrial Laundries, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1980
  4. In Re PreseaultSupreme Court of Vermont · 1972
  5. Tallarico v. BrettSupreme Court of Vermont · 1979

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. Randell BlakeSupreme Court of Vermont · 2017
  2. In Re Judy Ann's Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1983
  3. Rock v. Department of TaxesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1999
  4. Toensing v. Attorney Gen. of Vt.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2017
  5. Citibank (South Dakota), N.A. v. Dept. of Taxes / Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Dept. of TaxesSupreme Court of Vermont · 2016

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API