Bud Crossman Plumbing & Heating v. Commissioner of Taxes
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the CourtPeck, J.
This is an appeal by the plaintiff, a Rutland plumbing and heating contractor, from an order of the Washington Superior Court upholding a sales tax deficiency assessed against him by the Vermont Department of Taxes. Plaintiff *184applied to the Commissioner of Taxes for a hearing in accordance with 32 V.S.A. § 9777. At the conclusion of the hearing, the Commissioner determined the assessment was proper under 32 V.S.A., Chapter 233, whereupon the plaintiff appealed to the superior court, 32 V.S.A. § 9817, and subsequently to this Court. We affirm.
In the regular course of business, plaintiff bought…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- In Re Agency of Administration, Etc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1982
- Committee to Save the Bishop's House, Inc. v. Medical Center Hospital of Vermont, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1979
- State of Vermont Department of Taxes v. Tri-State Industrial Laundries, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1980
- In Re PreseaultSupreme Court of Vermont · 1972
- Tallarico v. BrettSupreme Court of Vermont · 1979
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. Randell BlakeSupreme Court of Vermont · 2017
- In Re Judy Ann's Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1983
- Rock v. Department of TaxesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1999
- Toensing v. Attorney Gen. of Vt.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2017
- Citibank (South Dakota), N.A. v. Dept. of Taxes / Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Dept. of TaxesSupreme Court of Vermont · 2016
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.