Legal Opinion

Gall v. Rushon

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided December 10, 1959No. File 115835Published

1Opinion of the CourtBogdanski, J.

The parties herein have stipulated to the facts of the case. The pertinent facts may be narrated as follows: On January 23,1958, the plaintiff Joseph Gall was operating his vehicle on Windsor Avenue, Windsor, with the plaintiffs Helen Gall and Mary Wasielewsld riding with him as passengers ; the decedent, Boscoe M. LaVey, was operating his vehicle behind the Gall vehicle, and as the Gall vehicle was stopped at an intersection for a red traffic light, said LaVey struck the Gall vehicle in the rear, thus causing injuries and damages to the plaintiffs; the accident resulted because the decedent…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Spalding v. ButtsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1825
  2. Husted v. HoytSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1837
  3. Tweedy v. BennettSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1863
  4. Peoples Bank & Trust Co. v. SeydelSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1920
  5. New Haven Savings Bank's Appeal From CommissionersConnecticut Superior Court · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API