Gall v. Rushon
Connecticut Superior Court
1Opinion of the CourtBogdanski, J.
The parties herein have stipulated to the facts of the case. The pertinent facts may be narrated as follows: On January 23,1958, the plaintiff Joseph Gall was operating his vehicle on Windsor Avenue, Windsor, with the plaintiffs Helen Gall and Mary Wasielewsld riding with him as passengers ; the decedent, Boscoe M. LaVey, was operating his vehicle behind the Gall vehicle, and as the Gall vehicle was stopped at an intersection for a red traffic light, said LaVey struck the Gall vehicle in the rear, thus causing injuries and damages to the plaintiffs; the accident resulted because the decedent…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Spalding v. ButtsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1825
- Husted v. HoytSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1837
- Tweedy v. BennettSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1863
- Peoples Bank & Trust Co. v. SeydelSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1920
- New Haven Savings Bank's Appeal From CommissionersConnecticut Superior Court · 1941