Legal Opinion

Tweedy v. Bennett

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided February 15, 1863PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Writ of error, brought by the plaintiffs as executors of George W. Ives, against wliom as executor of Henry Wolf the defendant in error had obtained a judgment in the superior court, in a case heretofore reported in 30 Conn. R., 329. The case is sufficiently stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtSanford, J.

When this case was before us at a former term, upon the finding of facts by the superior court, we advised judgment for the original plaintiff, now defendant in error. 30 Conn., 829.

At the next succeeding term of the superior court, the defendant, now plaintiff in error, offered a plea in which he alleged that since the last continuance he had represented to the proper court of probate that Wolf’s estate was insolvent, and that it was in fact insolvent, and that he had procured the appointment of commissioners, and was proceeding to settle the estate in that court as an insolvent estate. And…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bennett v. IvesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1862
  2. Rattoon v. OverackerNew York Supreme Court · 1811
  3. Bacon v. ParkerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1837

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Davis v. WeedSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1877
  2. Craig v. WagnerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1914
  3. Caffrey v. AlcornSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
  4. Peoples Bank & Trust Co. v. SeydelSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1920
  5. Gall v. RushonConnecticut Superior Court · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API