Legal Opinion

People v. Nealis

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 11, 1991No. Crim. A. No. 28410PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*Supp. 3Opinion

ROBERSON, P. J.

—Appellant was convicted after jury trial of battery (Pen. Code, § 242) and assault with a deadly weapon (Pen. Code, § 245, subd. (a)(1)). The main issue raised in this appeal is whether, as a matter of law, a dog may ever be considered a “deadly weapon or instrument,” within the meaning of Penal Code section 245, California’s statute proscribing assault with a deadly weapon.1

I

On November 30, 1988, around 6 a.m., Roberto Robles was waiting for his girlfriend to drive him home. He was standing in the parking lot of Tiny Naylor’s Restaurant where he had just left…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. People v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Commonwealth v. TarrantMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  3. People v. Jose R.California Court of Appeal · 1982
  4. People v. ClabornCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  5. People v. RussellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. People v. AguilarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Bull v. City and County of San FranciscoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  3. Morris v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
  4. People v. HendersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
  5. People v. FrazierCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API