People v. Nealis
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
*Supp. 3Opinion
ROBERSON, P. J.
—Appellant was convicted after jury trial of battery (Pen. Code, § 242) and assault with a deadly weapon (Pen. Code, § 245, subd. (a)(1)). The main issue raised in this appeal is whether, as a matter of law, a dog may ever be considered a “deadly weapon or instrument,” within the meaning of Penal Code section 245, California’s statute proscribing assault with a deadly weapon.1
I
On November 30, 1988, around 6 a.m., Roberto Robles was waiting for his girlfriend to drive him home. He was standing in the parking lot of Tiny Naylor’s Restaurant where he had just left…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- People v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
- Commonwealth v. TarrantMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
- People v. Jose R.California Court of Appeal · 1982
- People v. ClabornCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- People v. RussellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- People v. AguilarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
- Bull v. City and County of San FranciscoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Morris v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
- People v. HendersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- People v. FrazierCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.