Legal Opinion

P. v. Rose CA3

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 24, 2013No. C067448Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

Filed 6/24/13 P. v. Rose CA3 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115. IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT (Sacramento) ---- THE PEOPLE, C067448 Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. 96F09863) v. WARREN DAVID ROSE, JR., Defendant and Appellant. In the underlying civil…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Lucido v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  3. People v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Hubbart v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  5. People v. McKeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API