Legal Opinion

United States v. Chong

District Court, D. Hawaii

Decided March 22, 1999No. CR 98-416 ACKPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, TO DISQUALIFY

KAY, Chief Judge.

BACKGROUND

On January 4, 1999, Defendant’s attorney Michael A. Weight gave a document entitled “Defendant’s Supplemental Ex Parte Application for Funds for Mitigation Investigation” (“Application”) to his secretary for immediate filing. Thereafter, his secretary filed it with the Court.. Unfortunately, his secretary also misunderstood Mr. Weight’s directions and thought that Mr. Weight had authorized her to send a copy of the Application to Assistant United States Attorney Larry L. Butrick. The…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. United States v. GarciaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
  3. United States v. Richard A. HornCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
  4. United States v. Orlando Cordia Hall, Also Known as LanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
  5. United States v. Chake G. Kojayan, United States of America v. Hratch Meguerdity KalfayanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. WilsonDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2006
  2. United States v. StewartDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API