Legal Opinion

Effraim Milce and Valcina Milce v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 27, 2016No. 4D14-3744Published

1Opinion of the CourtGross, J.

We affirm the final judgment of foreclosure and write to address one issue— whether the trial court erred by proceeding to trial instead of staying the action pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.420(d). We hold that even though the bank had voluntarily dismissed the first foreclosure action, the homeowner was not entitled to a stay of the second action because there was no order liquidating the amount of costs to which the homeowners were entitled.

The bank filed a foreclosure action against the homeowners in 2009. In 2013, the bank voluntarily dismissed the action. In June 2013, the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Caufield v. CanteleSupreme Court of Florida · 2002
  2. Gordon v. WARREN HEATING & ACDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976
  3. McKelvey v. Kismet, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
  4. Estate of McGrail v. RosasDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
  5. Albertson's, Inc. v. NeilDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API