Legal Opinion

In re Paradyne Corp.

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided October 14, 1986No. Nos. 86-3504, 86-3532PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BY THE COURT:

Paradyne Corporation and eight individual co-defendants in a pending criminal case seek a writ of mandamus ordering the district court to refrain from various actions proposed in response to government motions to disqualify defense counsel. Primarily, petitioners challenge the district court judge’s announced plans to interview, in camera and outside the presence of counsel, individual defendants, witnesses, and attorneys in order to determine whether defense counsel received information protected by the attorney-client privilege of various individuals. Petitioners also request a…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
  2. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  4. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Cuyler v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Wheat v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Joseph C. Sun v. J. Owen Forrester, United States District JudgeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991
  3. United States v. Microsoft Corporation. United States of America v. Microsoft CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1995
  4. O'Dell v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1988
  5. United States v. McLainCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1987

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API