Legal Opinion

Miller v. TerriTory of Arizona

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 1905No. Criminal No. 185PublishedCited by 6 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the District Court of the Second Judicial District in and for the County of Graham. Fletcher M. Doan, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtDavis, J.

The defendant was charged by the indictment in this ease with “the crime of grand larceny, committed as follows: The said Frank Miller, on or about the 4th day of June, A. D. 1903, and before the finding of this indictment, at the county of Graham, territory of Arizona, did willfully,' unlawfully, and feloniously, take, steal, and drive away one certain animal of the horse species, to wit, a female colt about one year old, the said female colt then and there being the personal property of Mary Spofford; contrary to the statutes in such case made and provided, and against the peace and dignity…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. SotoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Jordt v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1869
  3. Martinez v. Territory of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Dickson v. Territory of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1899

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. WappensteinWashington Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Williams v. Territory of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1910
  3. State v. BaileyWashington Supreme Court · 1912
  4. State v. JakubowskiWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  5. State v. RuckerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1916

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API