Legal Opinion

State v. Trummer

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided September 30, 1996No. 95-CO-15PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Joseph E. O’Neill,

Presiding Judge.

The defendant-appellant appeared in the trial court charged with rape in violation of R.C. 2907.02(A)(2). Following trial to a jury, a verdict of guilty was returned and sentence was imposed. A notice of appeal was directed to this final judgment of the trial court.

The first assignment of error concerns itself with matters that occurred during the voir dire of the jury panel.

The trial judge conducted the voir dire to a great extent. Among the panel was a person named Keefer. During the voir dire, the trial judge read the indictment to the panel. He then asked…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. AdamsOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Berk v. MatthewsOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  3. State v. ThomasOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  4. State v. CurryOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Ohio v. WilkinsOhio Supreme Court · 1980

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Brown v. BobbyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
  2. State v. DemastryOhio Court of Appeals · 2003
  3. State v. MockOhio Court of Appeals · 2010
  4. State v. CooperOhio Court of Appeals · 2000
  5. State v. PaigeOhio Court of Appeals · 2019

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API