Tanglwood Lakes Community Ass'n v. Laskowski
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
HOFFMAN, Judge.
This is an appeal from a January 16, 1992 order denying appellant, S.U. Home Builders, Inc., post-trial relief. Appellant presents one issue on appeal:
Was the lower court divested of jurisdiction over the subject matter which is under appeal to the Superior Court?
Appellant’s brief at 3. For the reasons that follow, we affirm.
This appeal stems from a dispute arising from the construction of a home in Tanglwood Lakes, on property which was subject to the rules of the Tanglwood Lakes Community Association [hereinafter “Tanglwood”], appellee in the instant case. Appellant was hired…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Rouse Philadelphia Inc. v. Ad Hoc '78Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Travitzky v. TravitzkySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Bartle v. BartleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Ingram v. Dovertown Estates, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
3Cited by7 opinions
- Commonwealth v. PearsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Tucker v. R.M. ToursSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Matlock v. MatlockSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Hankin v. Graphic Technology Inc., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Montgomery County2010
- Commonwealth v. PearsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.