Qualls v. Justine Petersen Housing & Reinvestment Corp.
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
GARY M. GAERTNER, JR., Judge.
Introduction
Temeshia Qualls (claimant), appeals from a decision by the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (Commission) denying her unemployment benefits. We affirm.
Background
In March 2008, claimant began working part-time for Justine Petersen Housing & Reinvestment Corp. (employer). On February 1, 2009, claimant began working full-time as employer’s development and communications manager. At this time, claimant’s annual salary was $35,000.
On April 16, 2009, claimant received an email from employer’s chief executive officer, Robert Boyle. The email stated…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Moore v. Swisher Mower & MacHine Co., Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2001
- Noah v. Lindbergh Investment, LLCMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010
- Hill v. Norton & Young, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2010