Legal Opinion

Qualls v. Justine Petersen Housing & Reinvestment Corp.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided November 23, 2010No. ED 94485Published

1Opinion of the Court

GARY M. GAERTNER, JR., Judge.

Introduction

Temeshia Qualls (claimant), appeals from a decision by the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (Commission) denying her unemployment benefits. We affirm.

Background

In March 2008, claimant began working part-time for Justine Petersen Housing & Reinvestment Corp. (employer). On February 1, 2009, claimant began working full-time as employer’s development and communications manager. At this time, claimant’s annual salary was $35,000.

On April 16, 2009, claimant received an email from employer’s chief executive officer, Robert Boyle. The email stated…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Moore v. Swisher Mower & MacHine Co., Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2001
  2. Noah v. Lindbergh Investment, LLCMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010
  3. Hill v. Norton & Young, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API