Legal Opinion

Isaacs, Taylor & Williams v. City of Richmond

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided June 15, 1893PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Argued at Richmond. Decided at Wytheville. Appeal from decree of the chancery court of the city of Richmond, rendered November 23,1889, in a suit wherein the .city was complainant, and Isaacs, Taylor & Williams and others were defendants. Opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

Leayis, P.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

This was a suit in the chancery court of the city of Richmond, to restrain the prosecution of a number of pending actions at law against the city on certain small notes issued by *31the city during the late civil war. These notes were all under the denomination of five dollars, and were designed to circulate as currency. Some of them were issued under an ordinance of the council, passed on the 19th of April, 1861. The others were issued under an ordinance passed on the 14th of April, 1862. The aggregate amount of both issues exceeded $500,000.

The…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Soon Hing v. CrowleySupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  2. Minnesota v. BarberSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  3. Texas v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  4. Marsh v. Fulton CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  5. Thomas v. City of RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1871

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. City of San Antonio v. SullivanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1900
  2. Commonwealth v. AdcockSupreme Court of Virginia · 1851
  3. Commonwealth v. AdcockSupreme Court of Virginia · 1851
  4. Commonwealth v. AdcockSupreme Court of Virginia · 1851

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API