Legal Opinion
State v. Van Beek
Supreme Court of Iowa
Decided July 19, 1989No. 88-742PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SCHULTZ, Justice.
The State seeks further review from a dismissal of criminal charges for failure to meet the speedy indictment requirements set forth in Iowa Rule of Criminal Procedure 27(2)(a). Because we do not find the rule to be applicable under the present circumstances, we reverse.
This controversy stems from an incident that took place in a Rock Valley tavern on January 13, 1988. An officer, of the local police department observed defendants Allan L. Van Beek, Glenn Van Beek, and Matthew V. Kosters engaged in an activity believed to be consistent with cocaine use inside the tavern. The…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Beier Glass Co. v. BrundigeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1983
- United States v. Mikal Habeeb Amuny, A/K/A James Anderson, A/K/A Jim Waters, and A/K/A Wayne Roberson, George Ellis Gaston, and Royce David HebertCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
- State v. AllnuttSupreme Court of Iowa · 1968
- United States v. Donald HillegasCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
- State v. SchmittSupreme Court of Iowa · 1980
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State of Iowa v. Deantay Darelle WilliamsSupreme Court of Iowa · 2017
- State v. DavisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1994
- State v. Johnson-HugiSupreme Court of Iowa · 1992
- State v. WatersCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 1994
- State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 1996
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.