Rotner v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the CourtChristian, J.
The offense is attempt at arson; the punishment, confinement in the penitentiary for two years.
Appellant was convicted under the provisions of chapter 82, Acts of the Regular Session of the 42d Legislature (Vernon’s Ann. P. C. art. 1316). He contends that the act is unconstitutional ; the ground of the attack being that the penalty for attempt to commit arson, as set forth in article 1316, P. C., was changed, notwithstanding such change was not within the scope of the caption of chapter 82. We quote the caption of the act as follows : “An Act to amend Article 1316, Chapter 1,. Title 17, of…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Ex Parte HeartsillCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1931
- Ex Parte FaisonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1923
- Pozil and Jaffe v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1925
3Cited by18 opinions
- White v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1969
- Putnam v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
- Ex Parte MeyerCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1962
- Rowland v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1957
- Ex Parte FergusonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1939
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.