Zimmerman v. Kramer
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMabio Pittoot, J.
This is a proceeding pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Act to review a determination of the Board of Zoning and Appeals of the Town of North Hempstead, hereinafter sometimes called the respondents, in which a variance was granted to Evelyn Kupferman to install a swimming pool. The respondents move to dismiss the petition for the failure to join as a respondent, Evelyn Kupferman — an allegedly indispensable party.
The relief sought by the petitioner was formerly obtainable in a certiorari proceeding (Civ. Prac. Act, § 1283). It is for the review of a quasi-judicial determination…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Tod v. CrismanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
- Matter of Applicat'n of Clementi v. . JacksonNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
- Douglaston Civic Ass'n v. Board of Standards & AppealsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1951
- Farrell v. Mayor of RevereMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
- Douglaston Civic Ass'n v. Board of Standards & AppealsNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- 208 East 30th Street Corp. v. Town of North SalemAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Anchorage v. McCabeAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
- Anchorage v. McCabeAlaska Supreme Court · 1977