Legal Opinion

Elliott v. Farmers Insurance

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided May 21, 1901PublishedCited by 5 opinions

.Appeal from Muscatine District Court. — IIon. A. I. House, Judge. Action upon a policy of fire insurance. There was a trial to court, a jury being waived. From a judgment against plaintiff for costs, he appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtWaterman, J.

1 The policy covered a barn in West Liberty, which the application states was occupied by plaintiff. One condition of the policy was as follows: “This policy shall become voidi in each of the following instances, unless noted in said application, or consented to by the secretary of the company in writing hereon, viz.: If the assured ¡shall have, or shall hereafter make, any other insurance on "the property hereby insured, or any part thereof; or if the assured shall remove from the premises herein described, or if the above-mentioned premises be occupied by tenants, or be used for any other…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Carey v. German American InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Garretson v. Merchants & Bankers' InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1890
  3. Meadows v. Hawkeye InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1883
  4. Sexton v. Hawkeye Ins.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1886
  5. Oldham v. Anchor Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1894

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Sanborn v. Maryland Casualty CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1964
  2. DeBolt v. German American InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1917
  3. Chambers v. Home Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1932
  4. Houge v. Saint Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1916
  5. Mulrooney v. Royal Ins.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern Iowa · 1907

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API