In re August, 1993 Regular Grand Jury
District Court, S.D. Indiana
1Opinion of the Court
Entry Regarding [Hospital’s] Motion to Quash Subpoena & Motion for Protective Order, and United States’ Ex Parte Motion for Order Permitting Disclosure of Patient Medical Records
TINDER, District Judge.
As part of an ongoing investigation into possible criminal conduct by [a psychotherapist] 1 and other health providers, a grand jury sitting in the Southern District of *1382Indiana subpoenaed patient records from the [Hospital]. Because [the psychotherapist] exercised staff privileges at [the Hospital] and treated [Hospital] patients, the hospital has been asked to produce the following:
Any and all…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Branzburg v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Whalen v. RoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- United States v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Richardson v. Sexual Assault/Spouse Abuse Resource Center, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2011
- State v. OrwickOhio Court of Appeals · 2003
- Edwards v. Board of TrusteesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1994
- Attorney General Opinion No., Kansas Attorney General Reports2001