Legal Opinion
Amerada Hess Corp. v. SS Phillips Oklahoma
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 3, 1983No. 78 Civ. 1933 (JES)PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
SPRIZZO, District Judge.
Plaintiff Amerada Hess Corporation (“AHC”) commenced this civil action under the admiralty and maritime jurisdiction of the United States 1 seeking to recover damages from defendant, Philtankers, Inc. for its failure to deliver 8,681 barrels of oil from an ocean shipment of 627,661 barrels, for which AHC was consignee and Phil-tankers, Inc. was carrier. 2 Defendant denies liability for non-delivery of the oil, disputes the amount not delivered and counterclaims for damages for demurrage and for costs allegedly incurred in cleaning its vessel to remove…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Mitsui & Co., Ltd. And Ataka & Co., Ltd., Plaintiffs-Appellants-Cross v. American Export Lines, Inc., Defendant-Appellee-Cross-Appellant. Armstrong Cork Canada, Ltd., and Armstrong Cork Company v. American Export Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
- Levatino Company, Inc., Libelant v. American President Lines, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964
- Amoco Overseas Company v. ST AVENGERDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1975
- Kerr-McGee Refining Corp. v. M/V LA LIBERTADDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1981
- Levatino Co. v. American President Lines, Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 1964
3Cited by7 opinions
- Trans-Asiatic Oil Ltd., S.A. v. Apex Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1986
- Armada Supply, Inc. v. S/T AGIOS NIKOLASDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1985
- Arbitration between Trans-Asiatic Oil Ltd. S.A. v. UCO Marine International Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 1985
- Kanematsu Corp. v. M/V Gretchen WDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1995
- Armco Chile Prodein, S.A. v. The M/V NorlandiaDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 1995
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.