Legal Opinion

Pugh v. Pugh

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 28, 1857PublishedCited by 10 opinions

ERROR to the Madison Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtDavison, J.

Bill in chancery, filed in August, 1845, by Jacob and Elizabeth Pvgh, who were the complainants, against the plaintiffs in error, who were the defendants. The ease presented by the bill is as follows:

In the year 1833, the complainants, with their sister, Rebecca Pugh, appointed and fully authorized Evan Pugh, Sen., their father, to proceed to Inching county, Ohio, and collect from one Aaron Baker certain moneys then in his hands, to which they were entitled under the will óf their grandfather. Pursuant to his appointment, Evan Pugh collected for each of the complainants 35 dollars, and for…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Murray v. LylburnNew York Court of Chancery · 1817
  2. Hough v. CanbyIndiana Supreme Court · 1846
  3. Green v. VardimanIndiana Supreme Court · 1830

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Preston & Stetson v. McMillanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1877
  2. Riehl v. Evansville Foundry Ass'nIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Ross v. THOMPSONIndiana Court of Appeals · 1957
  4. Harris, Et Ux. v. Souder, Supt., Etc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1954
  5. De La Hunt v. HolderbaughIndiana Supreme Court · 1877

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API