Legal Opinion

American National Bank of Bluefield v. Ritz

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided February 27, 1912PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error to Circuit Court, Mercer County. Action by the American National Bank of Bluefield against Harold A. Ritz. From a judgment for defendant, plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

RobiNSON, Judge:

By this action in debt, the plaintiff bank seeks to recover from defendant the amount of two negotiable notes which he endorsed. The notes were made by the Southern West Virginia Fuel Company, and were discounted by the plaintiff for the benefit of that company.

Fowler, at whose request defendant endorsed, was president of the fuel company, and also president of the bank — a director in both corporations. Defendant also was a director in both corporations.

Defendant filed a special plea in which he avers, substantially, that he was merely an accomodation endorser of the notes at…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Allen v. South Boston RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889
  2. Gunster v. Scranton Illuminating, Heat & Power Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1897

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Goldstein v. Union National BankTexas Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Clifton v. TombCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1927
  3. Bank v. BryanWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Jameson v. Board of EducationWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Citizens National Bank v. BlizzardWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1917

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API