Legal Opinion

Rodgers v. Fleming

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 24, 1936No. Appeal, 326PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Maxey,

This was an action of assumpsit brought by Sarah Rodgers, administratrix c. t. a. of the Estate of Frank Rodgers, deceased, to recover from the defendant |5,-378.51, with interest from July 18, 1927. Plaintiff’s statement sets forth that Frank Rodgers in his life* time possessed $5,378.51 which he delivered to defendant for safe-keeping, and that Rodgers died on June 22, 1927, and by his last will gave his wife, Sarah, his entire estate. Plaintiff claims that on July 18, 1927, she demanded the return to her of the sum of $5,378.51, but that this demand was not…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kelly v. KellySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
  2. Pittsburgh v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
  3. Falconi v. MageeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1911

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Drob v. JaffeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  2. Commonwealth v. CameronSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  3. Kenerson v. FDICCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
  4. John E. Smith's Sons Co. v. Lattimer Foundry & Machine Co.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1956
  5. Main Belting Co. v. Corn Exchange National Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API