Legal Opinion

Garner v. Harrison

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided February 28, 1991No. S90A1226, S91A0171PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Clarke, Chief Justice.

This case concerns two wills executed by Gordie James Yancey. The Probate Court admitted a 1986 will to record. Maria H. Garner, the appellant here, contends a 1981 will should survive as the true will and testament of Mr. Yancey. A stepdaughter of the testator, Ms. Garner is a beneficiary under the 1981 will, but not under the 1986 will.

Ms. Garner filed two appeals. Case No. S90A1226 contests two orders of the probate court: (1) the dismissal of her caveat to the 1986 will; and (2) the dismissal of her appeal of the probate court’s order admitting that will to record.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Mennonite Board of Missions v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Tulsa Professional Collection Services, Inc. v. PopeSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Allan v. AllanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1976
  5. Adams v. First M. E. Church of Irving ParkIllinois Supreme Court · 1911

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Cobb County School District v. BarkerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1999
  2. Judicial Council of Ga. v. BROWN & GALLOSupreme Court of Georgia · 2010
  3. Old South Duck Tours, Inc. v. Mayor of SavannahSupreme Court of Georgia · 2000
  4. Cary v. RissWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Ray v. StewartSupreme Court of Georgia · 2010

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API