City of Tacoma v. Humble Oil & Refining Co.
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFinley, J.
This case comes to us on a writ of certiorari to review an order of public use and necessity issued in a condemnation action. The city of Tacoma is engaged in the development of a hydroelectric project on the Cowlitz River to provide electricity for the needs of the city. A part of the project is the construction of the Mayfield Dam. The reser voir behind the dam will inundate land in which the relators have mineral rights. The city seeks condemnation of the fee simple interest in the land, which, of course, wpuld include the mineral rights.
The relators do not deny that the creation of a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Sternoff v. SUP'R CT. FOR KING CTY.Washington Supreme Court · 1958
- State Ex Rel. Tacoma School District No. 10 v. StojackWashington Supreme Court · 1958
- State Ex Rel. Chelan Electric Co. v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1927
- City of Seattle v. FaussettWashington Supreme Court · 1923
- Clifford v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1944
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Rutter v. RutterWashington Supreme Court · 1962
- HTK Management, L.L.C. v. Seattle Popular Monorail AuthorityWashington Supreme Court · 2005
- Htk Management v. Seattle Monorail Auth.Washington Supreme Court · 2005
- STATE EX REL. CONVENTION CENTER v. EvansWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Dickgieser v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2005
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.