Legal Opinion
Yeager v. Fort Knox Security Products
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided February 10, 2015No. 14-4011UnpublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND JUDGMENT *
MONROE G. McKAY, Circuit Judge.
General Charles E. Yeager brought this action against Fort Knox Security Products (“Fort Knox”) asserting various claims under Utah law as well as the Lan-ham Act to redress the alleged misuse of his name and likeness in connection with the sale of Fort Knox products. The district court granted summary judgment for Fort Knox based on the doctrine of laches, and General Yeager has appealed. On de novo review, see Jacobsen v. Deseret Book Co., 287 F.3d 936, 948 (10th Cir.2002), we affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand for the reasons…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Gene S. Jacobsen, and Cross-Appellee v. Deseret Book Company, a Utah Corporation Dean Hughes, AndCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
- Petrella v. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Herb Reed Enterprises, LLC v. Florida Entertainment Management, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Charles Yeager v. Connie BowlinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- PBM PRODUCTS, LLC v. Mead Johnson & Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2011
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- SFF-TIR, LLC v. StephensonDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2017
- CSL Silicones Inc. v. Midsun Group Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2016
- Active Athletics, LLC v. Active Gymnastics Center LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2024
- Active Athletics, LLC v. Active Gymnastics Center LLCDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2024
- National Oilwell Varco, L.P. v. Black Diamond Oilfield Rentals, LLC, et al.District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2026