Casady v. Carraher
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Woodbury District Court. — Hon. J. F. Oliver,, Judge. Action for commission alleged to have been earned in procuring an exchange of properties. Verdict and judgment for the plaintiff. The defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtLadd, J.
The plaintiff is a real estate dealer. About -the middle of June, 1900, the defendant called at his office in Sioux City, and left a description of his three lots, with buildings thereon, situated in Hornict, Iowa, together with a stock of hardware and implements. The farm of M. J. Coombs-had been listed with plaintiff some time before. Defendant and Coombs examined their respective properties, and on the 26th of the month reached an understanding as to the terms of exchange. An agreement had been dictated to plaintiff’s stenographer, and the parties concluded to lunch while the shorthand…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Rice v. WoodMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
- Leathers v. CanfieldMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
- Orton v. ScofieldWisconsin Supreme Court · 1884
- Morey v. LairdSupreme Court of Iowa · 1899
- Lindt v. Schlitz Brewing Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1901
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Menzel v. MorseSupreme Court of Iowa · 1985
- Foley v. MathiasSupreme Court of Iowa · 1930
- Myer v. Preferred Credit, Inc.Harrison County Court of Common Pleas · 2001
- Clopton v. MeevesIdaho Supreme Court · 1913
- Stapp v. GodfreySupreme Court of Iowa · 1913
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.