Legal Opinion

Hickey v. Shellenbarger

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 1, 1914No. Docket No. 19PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to Shiawassee; Miner, J. Case by Otto Hickey against Henry Shelleiibarger for malicious prosecution. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtSteere, J.

This is an action for malicious prosecution involving a judgment against defendant for six cents damages and equal costs, brought here by defendant for review on a writ of error for the purpose, as we are informed, of maintaining his right, as a citizen willing to vindicate the law and assist the suppression of crime in discharge of his duty to society, to protection from annoying litigation resulting from such public service.

Plaintiff and defendant were formerly friends and copartners in the business of spraying orchards in Shiawassee county, but differences arose between them which resulted…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wilson v. BowenMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Patterson v. GarlockMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
  3. People v. DriverMichigan Supreme Court · 1913

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Renda v. International Union, UAWMichigan Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Taft v. J L Hudson Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1972
  3. Polk v. Missouri-Kansas-Texas RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1937
  4. Radzinski v. DoeMichigan Supreme Court · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API