Legal Opinion

Cincinnati Ins. Co. v. City of Talladega

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 7, 1977PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Plaintiff, Cincinnati Insurance Company, began this litigation by filing suit in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama seeking to have surety bonds issued in its name declared invalid and unenforceable. Judgment was entered against plaintiff, and plaintiff appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.

The Court of Appeals encountered uncertainty in the Alabama law applicable to the case and certified to this Court certain questions of law pursuant to Article 6, § 140 (b)(3), Constitution of Alabama of 1901, as amended in 1973, viz.:

"1.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Jenkins v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1880
  2. Hartford Accident Indemnity Company v. CosbySupreme Court of Alabama · 1965
  3. Shaller v. Commercial Standard Insurance CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Sun Ins. Office of London v. MitchellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
  5. Parsons v. Federal Realty Corp.Supreme Court of Florida · 1931

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. First Alabama Bank Of Montgomery, N.A. v. First State Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
  2. First Alabama Bank of Montgomery, N.A. v. First State InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
  3. Ex Parte OdemSupreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  4. Mass Appraisal Services, Inc. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
  5. ELMER TALLANT AGCY. v. Bailey Wood Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1979

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API