Legal Opinion
Mayo v. Rouselle Corp.
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided September 28, 1979PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Pursuant to Rule 18, ARAP, the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama, has requested this Court to answer a question of law which that court deemed determinative of an action before it on which there is no clear controlling precedent in the decisions of the Supreme Court of Alabama.
"In support of said certificate, the following facts are shown to the Court:
1. Style of the Case.
The style of the case is Auther L. Mayo and Janie Mayo v. Rouselle Corporation; Service Machine Company; Pearl Equipment Company; et al., Civil Action No. 78-G-0967-S, United States District…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Pickett v. MatthewsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
- Sellers v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1972
- State v. Pure Oil Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1951
- Peddy v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Alabama · 1977
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Ex Parte BirdSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
- Moore v. Mobile Infirmary Ass'nSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
- Reed v. BrunsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1988
- Fireman's Fund Am. Ins. Co. v. ColemanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981
- Lankford v. Sullivan, Long & HagertySupreme Court of Alabama · 1982
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.