Legal Opinion

Tiegs v. Patterson

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided November 21, 1957No. 8579PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McQUADE, Justice.

Plaintiff-appellant had been a director of Nampa-Meridian Irrigation District, a duly organized irrigation district in Ada and Canyon Counties, with its office at Nampa, Idaho. An election was conducted December 11, 1956, to choose a director from Division No. 3 of the district, which division appellant then represented. Both the appellant and the defendant-respondent were nominated for the office, and their names appeared on the ballot.

The board canvassed ballots December 17, 1956. Results of this canvass are not shown, but appellant demanded a re-count. Appellant alleges…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Budd v. HoldenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
  2. Toncray v. BudgeIdaho Supreme Court · 1908
  3. J. C. Penney Co. v. DiefendorfIdaho Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Harrison v. Board of County Com'rsIdaho Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Sparkman v. SaylorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hamby v. J. R. Simplot Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Hansen v. DevaneyIdaho Supreme Court · 1960
  3. People Ex Rel. Neilson v. WilkinsIdaho Supreme Court · 1980
  4. People Ex Rel. Neilson v. WilkinsIdaho Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Tiegs v. PattersonIdaho Supreme Court · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API