Legal Opinion

In re Perlmutter

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 2, 1987PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

Petitioner, the Departmental Disciplinary Committee for *172the First Department, seeks an order striking respondent’s name from the roll of attorneys, pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90 (4) (b), upon the ground that respondent has been disbarred based upon a felony conviction.

The respondent was admitted to practice as an attorney in New York State by the Appellate Division, First Department, on December 3, 1956 and maintains an office for the practice of law within the First Department.

On May 5, 1987, the respondent was convicted, after trial, of a violation of 18 USC § 1001, a…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re RichterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  2. In re LowellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982

4Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re PerlmutterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  2. In re PerlmutterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API