Legal Opinion

Clay v. Town of Gilbert

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided February 2, 1989No. 1 CA-CV 88-097PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CORCORAN, Judge.

Plaintiffs/Appellants (contestants), as qualified electors of the Town of Gilbert, appeal from the trial court’s judgment confirming the results of an election. This court has jurisdiction pursuant to A.R.S. §§ 12-120.21 and -2101. We affirm.

Facts

On August 4, 1987, the Gilbert Town Council adopted Resolution 836, calling for a special election to be held on September 15, 1987, to place two questions before the qualified electors of the Town: (1) whether the town should acquire the electricity distribution system owned by Arizona Public Service Company, which provided…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Cipriano v. City of HoumaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. United States & Interstate Commerce Commission v. American Railway Express Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
  3. City of Phoenix v. KolodziejskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Cohen v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1978
  5. City of Scottsdale v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1968

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Huggins v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Sherman v. City of TempeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
  3. Daniel Lachance, Henry Stephen Conroy v. County of Cochise Cochise County Jail DistrictCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API